Posted 1 week ago
1 Notes
Untitled
When you’re given lined paper, ask what are the lines.
I’d be remiss if I proceeded without giving credit to David Foster Wallace so before I go any further, credit him. At least with the conceptual basis of my initial thought. Yet a friend, a close friend, brought to my attention the following: what is autonomy without structure? Agency and the like are defined by “the lines.” To choose to live between the lines is to acknowledge that there are lines, no? That makes sense, doesn’t it? I promise I’m not being confusing for the sake of pseudo-intellectualism, or some self-indulgent desire to be “meta.” Frankly, that ostentatious bulls*&t only irks me.
Honestly, I’m contemplating with the aid of my keyboard and hoping some tangible learning will manifest. If not, I came. I typed. I babbled. I tried…
But one has to wonder is it meaningful to question for the sake of questioning. I can’t help but wonder how many OWS protestors protest because it’s en vogue; protest to have concrete opposition for a life laden with failure; protest to avoid boredom, boredom that creates space for contemplation, contemplation which, for most, is terrifying; protest to be apart of a body; protest for acceptance. How many know the power and the meaning of protesting? I’d be a fool to say I grasp the meaning of the act of protesting. I can only surmise the meaning. I could, and may very well, be wrong but I see protesting as both a declaration and a question. It declares that I deserve more and questions the quality of some facet of life. It ponders could this system, country, world be just.
a.
touch.
better than it is. The question mark, negligently, pardons us from responsibility. The question mark, courageously, demands accountability from others. The question mark is our adversary. The question mark is our savior. When given the paper, what will you do: ask what the lines are or wonder why we’re writing at all?



